Abstract

Clinical domain knowledge about diseases and their comorbidities, severity, treatment pathways, and outcomes can facilitate diagnosis, enhance preventive strategies, and help create smart evidence-based practice guidelines. To introduce a new representation of patient data called disease severity hierarchy that leverages domain knowledge in a nested fashion to create subpopulations that share increasing amounts of clinical details suitable for risk prediction. This retrospective cohort study included 51 969 patients aged 45 to 85 years, with 10 674 patients who received primary care at the Mayo Clinic between January 2004 and December 2015 in the training cohort and 41 295 patients who received primary care at Fairview Health Services from January 2010 to December 2017 in the validation cohort. Data were analyzed from May 2018 to December 2019. Several binary classification measures, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Gini score, sensitivity, and positive predictive value, were used to evaluate models predicting all-cause mortality and major cardiovascular events at ages 60, 65, 75, and 80 years. The mean (SD) age and proportions of women and white individuals were 59.4 (10.8) years, 6324 (59.3%) and 9804 (91.9%), respectively, in the training cohort and 57.4 (7.9) years, 21 975 (53.1%), and 37 653 (91.2%), respectively, in the validation cohort. During follow-up, 945 patients (8.9%) in the training cohort died, while 787 (7.4%) had major cardiovascular events. Models using the new representation achieved AUCs for predicting death in the training cohort at ages 60, 65, 75, and 80 years of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.98), and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.98-0.99), respectively, while standard methods achieved modest AUCs of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55-0.80), 0.66 (95% CI, 0.56-0.79), 0.64 (95% CI, 0.57-0.71), and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.54-0.70), respectively. In this study, the proposed patient data representation accurately predicted the age at which a patient was at risk of dying or developing major cardiovascular events substantially better than standard methods. The representation uses known relationships contained in electronic health records to capture disease severity in a natural and clinically meaningful way. Furthermore, it is expressive and interpretable. This novel patient representation can help to support critical decision-making, develop smart guidelines, and enhance health care and disease management by helping to identify patients with high risk.

Highlights

  • More than one-quarter of US adults have multiple chronic conditions (MCCs), with a prevalence that increases with age.[1,2,3] Patients with MCCs use more health care resources, incur high costs of care, and face greater mortality, with worse quality of life.[3,4,5] identifying, treating, and improving health outcomes of patients with MCCs have been hindered by the marked complexity and heterogeneity of this population

  • The representation uses known relationships contained in electronic health records to capture disease severity in a natural and clinically meaningful way

  • We developed age-specific survival models, in which we used the patient’s age instead of the traditional time-on-study as the scale for predicting the risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) and major cardiovascular event (MCE) at ages 60, 65, 75, and 80 years based on disease severity hierarchy (DSH) risk scores, while adjusting for sex and race/ethnicity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More than one-quarter of US adults have multiple (ie, Ն2) chronic conditions (MCCs), with a prevalence that increases with age.[1,2,3] Patients with MCCs use more health care resources, incur high costs of care, and face greater mortality, with worse quality of life.[3,4,5] identifying, treating, and improving health outcomes of patients with MCCs have been hindered by the marked complexity and heterogeneity of this population. Current methods tend to focus on traditional comorbidity representations, such as simple summaries of individual conditions (eg, counts, sums, and most recent values) or aggregate measures of comorbidities.[6] these representations do not reflect an individual’s comorbid disease history and severity and do not account for interactions with different treatment pathways. This leaves a large gap in our knowledge regarding how to optimally manage complex MCCs.[7]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.