Abstract

Many members of the Staphylococcus genus are clinically relevant opportunistic pathogens that warrant accurate and rapid identification for targeted therapy. The aim of this study was to develop a careful assignment scheme for staphylococcal species based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the 16S-23S rRNA region. All reference staphylococcal strains were identified at the species level using Sanger sequencing of the 16S rRNA, sodA, tuf, and rpoB genes and NGS of the 16S-23S rRNA region. To broaden the database, an additional 100 staphylococcal strains, including 29 species, were identified by routine diagnostic methods, 16S rRNA Sanger sequencing and NGS of the 16S-23S rRNA region. The results enabled development of reference sequences encompassing the 16S-23S rRNA region for 50 species (including one newly proposed species) and 6 subspecies of the Staphylococcus genus. This study showed sodA and rpoB targets were the most discriminative but NGS of the 16S-23S rRNA region was more discriminative than tuf gene sequencing and much more discriminative than 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Almost all Staphylococcus species could be distinguished when the max score was 99.0% or higher and the sequence similarity between the best and second best species was equal to or >0.2% (min. 9 nucleotides). This study allowed development of reference sequences for 21 staphylococcal species and enrichment for 29 species for which sequences were publicly available. We confirmed the usefulness of NGS of the 16S-23S rRNA region by identifying the whole species content in 45 clinical samples and comparing the results to those obtained using routine diagnostic methods. Based on the developed reference database, all staphylococcal species can be reliably detected based on the 16S-23S rRNA sequences in samples composed of both single species and more complex polymicrobial communities. This study will be useful for introduction of a novel diagnostic tool, which undoubtedly is an improvement for reliable species identification in polymicrobial samples. The introduction of this new method is hindered by a lack of reference sequences for the 16S-23S rRNA region for many bacterial species. The results will allow identification of all Staphylococcus species, which are clinically relevant pathogens.

Highlights

  • As of 2019, genus Staphylococcus comprises more than 50 validly described and proposed species, including both coagulase-positive staphylococci (CoPS) and coagulasenegative staphylococci (CoNS) (Euzéby, 1997; Becker et al, 2014; Parte, 2018)

  • Identification of the following pairs or groups of species was impossible because the 16S rRNA gene sequences were identical or almost identical (1 or 2 nucleotide differences): S. aureus - S. argenteus - S. schweitzeri; S. argensis - S. pettenkoferi – “S. pseudolugdunensis”; S. pseudintermedius S. intermedius; S. piscifermentans - S. carnosus subsp. carnosus; S. capitis subsp. urealyticus - S. caprae; S. agnetis – S. hyicus; S. condimenti - S. carnosus; S. epidermidis - S. haemolyticus; S. haemolyticus - S. equorum; S. gallinarum - S. haemolyticus; S. cohnii - S. kloosii; S. cohnii - S. nepalensis; S. pasteuri - S. warneri; S. microti - S. rostri; S. saprophyticus - S. xylosus; S. sciuri - S. lugdunensis and S. vitulinus - S. aureus

  • When an unknown organism needs to be identified in a clinical sample, 16S rRNA gene sequencing is the method of choice because of the availability of universal primers (Clarridge, 2004)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As of 2019, genus Staphylococcus comprises more than 50 validly described and proposed species, including both coagulase-positive staphylococci (CoPS) and coagulasenegative staphylococci (CoNS) (Euzéby, 1997; Becker et al, 2014; Parte, 2018). Changes in patient populations, such as the increased number of premature neonates, elderly and immunocompromised patients, and the increasing use of implanted foreign prosthetic material and indwelling catheters have led to a rise in documented infections caused by CoNS and CoPS other than S. aureus (Flores-Mireles et al, 2015; Giormezis et al, 2015; Butin et al, 2016; Savini et al, 2016). Because most studies report such infections as being caused by CoNS and do not differentiate isolates at the species level, the real impact of single species, especially less frequent species, is underreported. Accurate identification is highly desirable for precise therapy, monitoring the spread of infections with epidemiologic characteristics and investigating disease progression (Ghebremedhin et al, 2008; Hwang et al, 2011; Shin et al, 2011; Becker et al, 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.