Abstract

The quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score has been introduced to predict the likelihood of organ dysfunction in patients with suspected infection. We hypothesized that machine-learning models using qSOFA variables for predicting three-day mortality would provide better accuracy than the qSOFA score in the emergency department (ED). Between January 2016 and December 2018, the medical records of patients aged over 18 years with suspected infection were retrospectively obtained from four EDs in Korea. Data from three hospitals (n = 19,353) were used as training-validation datasets and data from one (n = 4234) as the test dataset. Machine-learning algorithms including extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine, and random forest were used. We assessed the prediction ability of machine-learning models using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, and DeLong’s test was used to compare AUROCs between the qSOFA scores and qSOFA-based machine-learning models. A total of 447,926 patients visited EDs during the study period. We analyzed 23,587 patients with suspected infection who were admitted to the EDs. The median age of the patients was 63 years (interquartile range: 43–78 years) and in-hospital mortality was 4.0% (n = 941). For predicting three-day mortality among patients with suspected infection in the ED, the AUROC of the qSOFA-based machine-learning model (0.86 [95% CI 0.85–0.87]) for three -day mortality was higher than that of the qSOFA scores (0.78 [95% CI 0.77–0.79], p < 0.001). For predicting three-day mortality in patients with suspected infection in the ED, the qSOFA-based machine-learning model was found to be superior to the conventional qSOFA scores.

Highlights

  • IntroductionSeveral meta-analyses of quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scores have shown that these scores had a poor sensitivity for predicting in-hospital mortality [10,11,12,13,14]

  • The early recognition and prompt treatment of sepsis in the emergency department (ED) are important to improve patient outcomes [1]

  • We suggest that our quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment (qSOFA)-based machine-learning model incorporated with real-time clinical variables on the electronic medical record (EMR) can be utilized by physicians for making clinical decisions for treating sepsis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several meta-analyses of qSOFA scores have shown that these scores had a poor sensitivity for predicting in-hospital mortality [10,11,12,13,14]. Warning scores [15,16], a tool for identifying hospitalized patients at risk of deterioration, have been proposed for predicting hospital mortality in those with suspected sepsis in the ED [7,17,18,19,20]. Hamilton et al reported that the early warning scores were not accurate in predicting sepsis mortality in the ED (67% of sensitivity and 60% of specificity) [21]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.