Abstract
Different porosity measurement methods are investigated and compared to ascertain a relatively accurate and efficient method suitable for laboratory utilization. As model material Sr0.895Y0.07TiO3−δ (SYT) ceramic material, which is designed as anode substrate for planar solid oxide fuel cells, is studied. Seven batches with different porosity are investigated using image analysis method and Archimedean porosimetry, operating under different conditions, and compare with the results from mercury porosimetry. The experimental results reveal for these methods different accuracies of the true porosity for different porosity ranges.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
