Abstract
PurposeTo examine the fidelity of our model of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) in boys and evaluate its value in resident training programs and the learning of basic laparoscopy skills. MethodsWe created a simulation model with inexpensive, easy-to-obtain equipment. Study participants from 34 university hospital departments received a user manual and an evaluation questionnaire (11 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale). We considered that the evaluation was positive when the median overall score was 4 or over. We compared the results for residents (n=26) vs. expert surgeons (n=29) (t tests). ResultsThe duration of the procedure was significantly longer among the residents (30.0±16.8 min) than among the expert surgeons (20.5±11.7 min; p=0.01). In both groups, the participants rated the model favorably with regard to the overall impression (median score: 4.0±1.0), realism (4.0±0.9), ease of access to the required equipment (5.0±0.6), the quality of the user manual (5.0±0.6), ease of assembly (5.0±0.8), ease of the procedure (5.0±0.8), value in resident training programs (4.0±0.9), and value in learning basic laparoscopy skills (5.0±0.8)). The evaluation was positive (4.0±0.9). ConclusionOur low-cost model was an effective teaching and training tool for LIHR and basic laparoscopy skills. Level of EvidenceLevel IV.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.