Abstract

Abstract. There are a number of statistical techniques that downscale coarse climate information from general circulation models (GCMs). However, many of them do not reproduce the small-scale spatial variability of precipitation exhibited by the observed meteorological data, which is an important factor for predicting hydrologic response to climatic forcing. In this study a new downscaling technique (Bias-Correction and Stochastic Analog method; BCSA) was developed to produce stochastic realizations of bias-corrected daily GCM precipitation fields that preserve both the spatial autocorrelation structure of observed daily precipitation sequences and the observed temporal frequency distribution of daily rainfall over space. We used the BCSA method to downscale 4 different daily GCM precipitation predictions from 1961 to 1999 over the state of Florida, and compared the skill of the method to results obtained with the commonly used bias-correction and spatial disaggregation (BCSD) approach, a modified version of BCSD which reverses the order of spatial disaggregation and bias-correction (SDBC), and the bias-correction and constructed analog (BCCA) method. Spatial and temporal statistics, transition probabilities, wet/dry spell lengths, spatial correlation indices, and variograms for wet (June through September) and dry (October through May) seasons were calculated for each method. Results showed that (1) BCCA underestimated mean daily precipitation for both wet and dry seasons while the BCSD, SDBC and BCSA methods accurately reproduced these characteristics, (2) the BCSD and BCCA methods underestimated temporal variability of daily precipitation and thus did not reproduce daily precipitation standard deviations, transition probabilities or wet/dry spell lengths as well as the SDBC and BCSA methods, and (3) the BCSD, BCCA and SDBC methods underestimated spatial variability in daily precipitation resulting in underprediction of spatial variance and overprediction of spatial correlation, whereas the new stochastic technique (BCSA) replicated observed spatial statistics for both the wet and dry seasons. This study underscores the need to carefully select a downscaling method that reproduces all precipitation characteristics important for the hydrologic system under consideration if local hydrologic impacts of climate variability and change are going to be reasonably predicted. For low-relief, rainfall-dominated watersheds, where reproducing small-scale spatiotemporal precipitation variability is important, the BCSA method is recommended for use over the BCSD, BCCA, or SDBC methods.

Highlights

  • General circulation models (GCMs) are considered robust tools for simulating future changes in climate and for developing climate scenarios for quantitative impact assessments (Wilks, 1999; Karl and Trenberth, 2003; Fowler et al, 2007)

  • The bias-correction and constructed analog (BCCA) results improved over the BCSD_daily results but still underpredicted the daily precipitation standard deviation because the linear regression scheme used to construct the analogs in BCCA attenuates extreme events and decreases temporal variance

  • The results show that the BCSD_daily and BCCA method underestimated the observed 90th percentile daily precipitation amount and overestimated the 50th percentile of daily precipitation because of their tendency to overestimate the occurrence of small rainfall events

Read more

Summary

Introduction

General circulation models (GCMs) are considered robust tools for simulating future changes in climate and for developing climate scenarios for quantitative impact assessments (Wilks, 1999; Karl and Trenberth, 2003; Fowler et al, 2007). GCM results are generally insufficient to provide useful prediction of climate variables on the local to regional scale needed to assess hydrologic impacts because of significant uncertainties in the modeling process (Allen and Ingram, 2002; Didike and Coulibaly, 2005). The coarse resolution of existing GCMs (typically > 100 km by 100 km) precludes the simulation of realistic circulation patterns and representation of the small-scale spatial. Mismatch of the spatial resolution between GCMs and hydrologic models generally precludes the direct use of GCM outputs to predict hydrologic impacts

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.