Abstract
Modern urban and metropolitan universities are increasingly obliged to recognize their role as anchor institutions. These same institutions of higher education (IHEs) also have a responsibility to educate students to be responsible and participatory citizens in society. An increasing number of IHEs recognize these distinct commitments as central to the public purpose of higher education. However, few intentionally involve students in anchor mission work. This misalignment denies students a rich opportunity for civic learning and democratic engagement. Furthermore, it prevents IHEs and their surrounding communities from realizing the benefits of harmonizing these two commitments. This mixed-methods research study resulted in the development of the Student Anchor Engagement Framework, a 36-item strategic framework designed to identify how IHEs can intentionally involve students in anchor strategy. The framework derives from The Democracy Collaborative’s Anchor Institution Community Benefit Dashboard. Expert participants ranked all items included in the framework as to their potential to influence student civic learning and democratic engagement. Implications of this research study include the potential for IHEs to consider, strategically, ways to align student civic learning with anchor institution practices for the advancement of both pursuits.
Highlights
Higher education in the United States aims to fulfil multiple missions
All engagement items included in the framework ranked as having a potential positive impact on student civic learning and democratic engagement
This research study resulted in the development of the Student Anchor Engagement Framework, which identifies specific ways that students can be involved in anchor strategy (Kebea, 2016)
Summary
Higher education in the United States aims to fulfil multiple missions. While preparing students to serve as professionals in their field of study remains the primary goal, many urban and metropolitan institutions of higher education (IHEs) embrace two public purposes. The second is to consider how an IHE serves as an institutional citizen and anchor institution within the local communities where they operate. In many ways, these two public purposes of higher education are complimentary; researcher or practitioners do not typically consider them together. These two public purposes of higher education are complimentary; researcher or practitioners do not typically consider them together This mixed-methods study sought to develop a strategic framework, in which IHEs, serving as anchor institutions, can facilitate civic learning and democratic engagement by involving students in the anchor mission of the institution.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
