Abstract

This article seeks to open this dialogue by questioning the role of technology teacher preparation programs that are based on an “industrial tool use” model to develop technology education teachers. It is the position of the authors that the manner by which technology education teachers are prepared may need revision and that technology teacher educators need to reanalyze the objectives and methods used to develop their proteges. The ideas posited in this article find their locus in the experience of the authors while directing the rewrite of the K-12 Technology Education Standards for the state of Texas. Technical courses are those that focus on developing the knowledge and skills to use tools, machines, and equipment at a proficient level of capability. Technical courses taken at the high school level are referred to, in this article, as vocational-technical education. The technical courses taken after high school, but at a level less than the baccalaureate are referred to as technical education and are not the subject of this article. The technical courses taken in a baccalaureate program, such as industrial technology or engineering technology, are referred to as the industrial tool use model.

Highlights

  • This article seeks to open this dialogue by questioning the role of technology teacher preparation programs that are based on an “industrial tool use” model to develop technology education teachers

  • Asking the Question What is the desired outcome of a technology education program? In posing this question to the technology teachers involved in rewriting the technology education curriculum in Texas (Hansen, 1996), the authors discovered a clear dichotomy of opinion among the teachers about the purpose(s) of technology education

  • If one observed the teaching of industrial arts and vocational-technical education in actual settings, could one detect any differences between them? If one analyzed the purpose, content, methodology of instruction, and clientele, could one tell the difference? Sanders’ (2001) study indicated that 65.6% of the technology education programs still use either a “unit lab” or “general lab” for the instructional facilities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article seeks to open this dialogue by questioning the role of technology teacher preparation programs that are based on an “industrial tool use” model to develop technology education teachers. If one observed the teaching of industrial arts and vocational-technical education in actual settings (in the classroom, at the university, or in the high school), could one detect any differences between them? Content, clientele, and purpose are pragmatically the same before and after the name conversion, aren't the new technology education programs really vocational-technical education?

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call