Developing Surgical Oncology Services in Resource Constrained Settings: Results of a Systematic and Motivated Approach

Abstract

Background: General surgeons trained in surgical oncology and working in a general service hospital can offer and provide a wide variety of oncological services although significant limitations exist compared with a true tertiary cancer care center in developed high income countries. Providing optimal and standard of care surgical oncology services is truly demanding and limitations in ancillary and support services can potentially limit the quality of care provided in resource constrained settings like ours. Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the patterns of care, surgical outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality, quality of resection in terms of margins and nodal yield over a period of 08 weeks in a general service hospital with resource constrained setting and with two trained and motivated surgical oncologists. Methods: Data of 22 patients with solid organ cancers who underwent major operative treatment both curative and palliative under the surgical oncology services were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were evaluated clinically, imaging as required and pathologic tissue diagnosis of cancer obtained as was possible and after adequate preoperative preparation were operated upon. Results: Four patients of carcinoma rectum underwent low anterior resection with diverting ileostomy, one patient with rectal cancer had APR with permanent end colostomy, two patients underwent total thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer, eight patients underwent modified radical mastectomy for carcinoma breast, two patients had optimal cytoreductive surgery for carcinoma ovary -one patient upfront and another as interval cytoreduction, two cases of soft tissue tumor underwent limb salvage surgery, one case of carcinoma stomach underwent subtotal gastrectomy, one case of carcinoma cecum underwent classic right radical hemicolectomy. Two patients underwent emergency exploration for acute abdomen who were otherwise metastatic for palliation. All but one case received neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery in carcinoma rectum, one case of carcinoma ovary and carcinoma breast were operated after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall there was only one margin positive resection after low anterior resection who was operated upfront due to impending obstruction. The average nodal yield in all cases of colorectal carcinomas and breast cancer cases were as per current NCCN standards. Morbidities included seroma collection in 3 patients, minor surgical site infection in 2 patients, peristomal allergy in two patients, there were no deaths in elective cases. Conclusion: Providing quality surgical oncology services in a resource constrained general service hospital is challenging. Through an aggressive, well planned and motivated approach with a good surgical oncology training background and with available resources it is possible to achieve a varied spectrum, quality care and an improved and sustainable healthcare oncology systems for better outcomes even in these settings.