Abstract

Purely financial players without any physical assets can participate in day-ahead electricity markets as virtual bidders. They can arbitrage the price difference between day-ahead (DA) and real-time (RT) markets to maximize profits. Virtual bidders encounter various monetary risks and uncertainties in their decision-making due to the high volatility of the price difference. Therefore, this paper proposes a max-min two-level optimization model to derive the optimal bidding strategy of virtual bidders. In this model, the risks of uncertainties associated with the rivals’ strategies and RT market prices are managed by robust optimization. The proposed max-min two-level model is turned into a single-level mixed integer linear programming model through duality theory (DT), strong duality theory (SDT), and Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions. An illustrative case is designed to demonstrate the advantages of the proposed model over the deterministic model. Moreover, case studies on the IEEE 24-bus test system validate the applicability of the proposed model.

Highlights

  • A model reported in [5] presents the motivations for market participants (MPs) to place virtual bids at the specific buses which are tied to the financial transmission right (FTR) position owned by the MPs

  • To consider the risks of the forecasted uncertainty sources, a robust optimization approach is employed in this paper, which is widely applied by the risk-averse market participants [28]

  • KKT optimality conditions, strong duality theory (SDT), and the big-M method are employed to translate the two-level problem into a MILP problem

Read more

Summary

Sets and Indices t

Index for time periods. Index for virtual participants. Index for generating units. Index for Generation blocks. Index for demands. Index for demand blocks. Index for transmission lines. Decision variables set for the upper/lower level subproblems, respectively. Uncertain variables set. Dual variables set for the lower-level subproblem.

Parameters λRtnT PtGjb
INTRODUCTION
Virtual Bidding
Lower-Level
EQUIVALENT MILP FORMULATION
Objective
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE
Data and Cases Setups
Results and discussion
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call