Abstract

Study objective: To generate and validate nomograms to predict any-stage and stage III-IV endometriosis before surgery in infertile women.Design: A single center retrospective cohort study.Setting: University affiliated hospital.Patients: Infertile patients (n = 1,016) who underwent reproductive surgery between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2019.Interventions: None.Main outcome measurements: We randomly selected 2/3 of the included patients (667 patients, training sample) to analyze and generate predictive models and validated the models on the remaining patients (339 patients, validation sample). A multivariate logistic regression model was used with the training sample to select variables using a back stepwise procedure. Nomograms to predict any-stage and stage III–IV endometriosis were constructed separately. The discriminations and calibrations of both nomograms were tested on the overall population and a subgroup without endometrioma diagnosed on transvaginal sonography (TVS) of training and validation samples. The impact of different variables in these models was evaluated.Results: There were 377 (55.7%) women in the training sample and 196 (57.8%) in the validation sample who were diagnosed with endometriosis. The nomogram predicting any-stage endometriosis had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.760 for the training sample and 0.744 for the validation sample, with favorable calibrations in the overall population. However, the performance was significantly decreased in patients without endometrioma on TVS, with an AUC of 0.726 in the training sample and 0.694 in the validation sample. Similarly, the nomogram predicting stage III–IV endometriosis had an AUC of 0.833 and 0.793 for the training and validation samples, respectively, as well as a favorable calibration. However, the performance of the nomogram on patients without endometrioma on TVS was poor. Endometrioma on TVS strongly predicted both any stage and stage III–IV endometriosis on both samples.Conclusion: We developed nomograms to predict any-stage and stage III–IV endometriosis but their performance were significantly decreased in patients without endometrioma on TVS. Endometrioma on TVS strongly predicted any and III–IV stage endometriosis in both sample groups. Therefore, we recommend that this study be used as encouragement to advance the utilization of advanced imaging for endometriosis for better clinical prognosis.

Highlights

  • Endometriosis is a common gynecological disorder characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside of the uterine cavity [1]

  • The nomogram for any-stage endometriosis had an areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.780 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.746–0.814] in the overall population and 0.726 in the subgroup that was negative for endometrioma diagnosed on transvaginal sonography (TVS)

  • The AUCs of the model built by endometrioma on TVS only for stage III–IV endometriosis was 0.769 in the training sample and 0.764 in the validation sample, indicating that stage III–IV endometriosis can be reliably predicted using imaging

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endometriosis is a common gynecological disorder characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside of the uterine cavity [1]. Women with endometriosis typically present with infertility and pelvic pain, but can be asymptomatic [2]. As in vitro fertilization (IVF) is an alternative choice for infertile women, it will be helpful if endometriosis is identified with preoperative clinical data [5]. Plenty of studies have associated preoperative clinical data with endometriosis [6]. No consensus has been reached on the best predictive models for endometriosis due to the diverse study population, different diagnostic criteria, and various predictive factors [6, 7]. The most common models using pain to predict endometriosis are not as accurate in diagnosing asymptomatic endometriosis, which is often found in infertile women [8]. Several reports have predicted endometriosis in infertile women yet with some limitations. Some studies are not practical, as they used patients with normal pelvis as controls [10, 11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call