Abstract

PurposeTo examine whether age-related reference ranges for “normal” prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change (determined in men without prostate cancer) can be used to identify men at high risk of having prostate cancer.MethodsSubjects were men aged 50–69 years with PSA < 10 ng/mL from the UK-based Prostate Testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study. Men with prostate cancer were categorized as high or low risk of progression (Low risk: Gleason score ≤ 6 and stage T1–T2a; High risk: Gleason score 7–10 or stage T2C). Men without prostate cancer were those with no histological confirmation of prostate cancer. Previously developed longitudinal reference ranges for normal age-related PSA change were used to calculate an age-specific PSA threshold. We compared the ability of our age-specific PSA threshold to discriminate between high- and no/low-risk prostate cancer with that of two existing thresholds: (i) threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages; (ii) National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines dependent on age-group thresholds (age 50–59: PSA = 3 ng/mL; age 60–70: PSA = 4 ng/mL; age ≥ 70: PSA = 5 ng/mL).ResultsWe included 823 men with high-risk prostate cancer and 80,721 men with no/low-risk prostate cancer. A threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages identified more high-risk prostate cancers, recommending biopsy in 9.8% of men, of which 10.3% (n = 823) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the NICE guidelines as the threshold for biopsy, 6.9% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 11.9% (n = 668) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the new age-specific threshold for biopsy, 2.3% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 15.2% (n = 290) had high-risk prostate cancer. The age-specific threshold identified fewer high-risk prostate cancers, but fewer men received unnecessary biopsy.ConclusionThere is no benefit to using reference ranges for “normal” PSA that change with age nor the age-specific thresholds suggested by the NICE guidelines. While the age-varying thresholds are more discriminatory, too many high-risk cancers are missed.

Highlights

  • Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, followed by biopsy if the PSA level is raised, is a widely accepted screening method for prostate cancer [1]

  • There were 81,553 men aged ≥ 50 years with at least one PSA result and PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL. 9 men were dropped from analysis as their clinical information was missing

  • There were no substantial differences in baseline characteristics between men with high-risk prostate cancer and no/ low-risk prostate cancer other than mean age (62.4 years vs. 59.3 years, p ≤ 0.001) and mean PSA level (5.5 vs. 1.3 ng/ mL, p ≤ 0.001) (Table S1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, followed by biopsy if the PSA level is raised (typically ≥ PSA 3–4 ng/mL), is a widely accepted screening method for prostate cancer [1]. PSA levels increase with age, and the natural variability in PSA level (both within men over time, and between men) is likely to be greater in older men [5], obscuring disease-related changes. Current age-related PSA thresholds are based on cross-sectional data and do not attempt to distinguish these different sources of variability, nor to describe serial changes in PSA level for aging individuals

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call