Abstract
Ding and Bruce offer an in-depth critical discussion of key issues and concepts that relate to the development of EAP (English for Academic Purposes) practitioners, which they see as an ongoing, long-term process. They first address background issues that include the origins and use of the term practitioner, professionalism and EAP, as well as the limited ‘cultural capital’ that EAP practitioners bring to universities. Development is then considered in relation to the contributions of qualifications and self-directed activity, such as through reflection. In particular, they critique reflective practice and consider its limitations as a development tool. The chapter concludes by recommending the accrual of ‘cultural capital’ through scholarship and research activity as a basis for establishing the identity and agency of the practitioner.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
