Abstract

There is the potential for high-dimensional information about patients collected in clinical trials (such as genomic, imaging, and data from wearable technologies) to be informative for the efficacy of a new treatment in situations where only a subset of patients benefits from the treatment. The adaptive signature design (ASD) method has been proposed for developing and testing the efficacy of a treatment in a high-efficacy patient group (the sensitive group) using genetic data. The method requires selection of three tuning parameters which may be highly computationally expensive. We propose a variation to the ASD method, the cross-validated risk scores (CVRS) design method, that does not require selection of any tuning parameters. The method is based on computing a risk score for each patient and dividing them into clusters using a nonparametric clustering procedure.We assess the properties of CVRS against the originally proposed cross-validated ASD using simulation data and a real psychiatry trial. CVRS, as assessed for various sample sizes and response rates, has a substantial reduction in the computational time required. In many simulation scenarios, there is a substantial improvement in the ability to correctly identify the sensitive group and the power of the design to detect a treatment effect in the sensitive group.We illustrate the application of the CVRS method on the psychiatry trial.

Highlights

  • It is increasingly common in clinical trials to collect a large amount of potentially high-dimensional data about patients such as genomic, imaging, and data from wearable technologies

  • We have presented a modification of the cross-validated ASD method (CVASD) method.[3]

  • By contrast to the existing CVASD method that considers a prespecified number or covariates reaching a prespecified significance level and a prespecified odds ratio, the cross-validated risk scores (CVRS) method allows all of the covariates to contribute to the construction of a signature, eliminating a need for the prior assumptions about the number of the true causal covariates, significance level and odds ratio

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is increasingly common in clinical trials to collect a large amount of potentially high-dimensional data about patients such as genomic, imaging, and data from wearable technologies. Genetic signatures that are constructed based on a combination of multiple variables such as gene expression profiling, have been used to determine a subpopulation in which the novel treatment is efficacious.[1,2,3,4]. The adaptive signature design (ASD)[2] allows a trial to develop and test efficacy of a treatment in a high-efficacy group of patients (the sensitive group) using two stages: the first stage is used to build a genetic signature, and in the second stage, the signature is applied to select the sensitive group.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call