Abstract

Like many other countries, South Africa has come under public pressure to introduce mandatory labelling for genetically modified (GM) foods. Although there is increased understanding of the social and political implications of GM labelling in developed countries, implications for the global South are still poorly understood. South Africa, as a country that consumes, produces and trades GM food, represents a fitting case study of these dimensions in the context of a developing economy. Via policy analysis, stakeholder interviews and document inquiry we offer an overview of the evolution of GM labelling, investigate the central influences on its development and implementation, determine the critical issues and identify the factors impeding or facilitating implementation. Our findings reveal that many significant events and decisions influenced the policy on mandatory GM food labelling in South Africa. They also suggest that several pertinent and problematic issues arose during its development as a result of the contentious nature of GM food labelling; stakeholder opinions, influences, and conflicted positions; and its practical complexity. Key implementation issues included divergent interpretations, and thus high levels of ambiguity; an inefficient National Consumer Commission; a lack of recourse for non-compliance; and the absence of a government-enforcement agency. Lower capacity in developing countries underscores the importance of a participation process that is believable by and inclusive of all actors. Stakeholders’ opinions about the policy development process were affected by their predetermined viewpoints about GMOs. Findings emphasise the influence of larger policy debates about the acceptability of GMOs on participatory processes, and the importance of contextualising GM labelling policies within such debates.
 Significance:
 
 The first review of the evolution of mandatory GM food labelling policy in South Africa is provided.
 A knowledge gap with regard to GM food labelling in developing countries is filled.
 The importance of procedural fairness in determining the degree of stakeholder satisfaction with policy decisions is revealed.

Highlights

  • The labelling of genetically modified (GM) food is regarded as one of the most disputed food issues of the 21st century.[1,2] As the land under GM crops has grown – reaching over 185 million hectares in 2016 from its inception in 1996 – GM food has increasingly entered our food chains.[3]

  • Stakeholder interviews and document inquiry we offer an overview of the evolution of GM food labelling, investigate the central influences on its development and implementation, determine the critical issues and identify the factors impeding or facilitating implementation

  • Our findings reveal that many significant events and decisions influenced the policy on mandatory GM food labelling in South Africa

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The labelling of genetically modified (GM) food is regarded as one of the most disputed food issues of the 21st century.[1,2] As the land under GM crops has grown – reaching over 185 million hectares in 2016 from its inception in 1996 – GM food has increasingly entered our food chains.[3]. In 2004, the DTI published a Green Paper on consumer policy, in which they proposed a new law to protect consumers and provided a first glimpse of proposals for GM food labelling.[22] Voluntary labelling was subsequently introduced under the Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfectants Act, which required labelling if food differed significantly from its conventional (non-GM) counterpart in terms of nutritional composition, storage requirements, preparation or cooking, or if it contained an allergen or a human or animal gene.

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call