Abstract
Did we achieve our training objectives? The written test suggested that significant learning did occur. However, these results should be viewed with caution. We attempted to do a three-month follow-up posttest, but our rate of return was too small to analyze. Also, the resuits of the field performance study indicate a significant improvement in only two skills: EMTs commenting on the patients' problems and saying goodbye to patients. Because of the large numbers of participants at the Boston workshop, it consisted primarily of lectunes and large-group discussions and minimal interaction between the trainees and faculty. Also, there were few opportunities to practice the skills discussed in the workshop. However, in Essex Junction, the smaller numbers helped to correct these deficiencies. Although this did not change the overall results of the test scores, it probably accounted for the higher posttest scores in Essex Junction. As a result of our findings, we revised the pilot course to emphasize a small-group seminar format with opportunities for practicing skills through role-playing exercises and small-group discussions. Our experience suggests that intensive training of this type can help prehospital caretakers provide more effective care to acutely distressed emergency patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.