Abstract
This qualitative research based on phenomenology might prove useful in writing the Investment Policy for Institutional Investors in nascent capital markets. The study provides insight into how institutional investors prepare for imminent occurrence of extreme market conditions and the measures they adopt to mitigate the consequences of such extreme market conditions on their investment portfolios. The responses were collected over nearly one and a half years, from March 2013 to September 2014, using various forums held in different cities of the world. The study adopted the methodological triangulation approach to reinforce the findings and build credibility whilst enhancing the usefulness of the findings. This was done by interacting with different groups of respondents and different forums to confirm the findings. All of the respondents were senior decision makers from a wide variety of Institutional Investment entities. From the detailed analysis of the responses emerged concise but dominant topics and strategies. Some of these include risk-based diversification, volatility regimes and risk indicators, low volatility anomalies, rebalancing, going long volatility, longer horizon, rule-based decision making and corporate governance, counter-cyclicality, benchmark agnostic strategies and valuation fundamentals.
Highlights
For a portfolio manager, one of the most important tasks is to make sure the portfolio value does not fall drastically under extreme market conditions
Program trading and index arbitrage [2] were strategies that had gained some popularity prior to the market crash in 1987, this failed during the 1987 market crash
Option based portfolio insurance [3] and “constant proportion portfolio insurance” (CPPI) [4], that uses volatility products such as VIX based products [5], were strategies that gained some credence during the crisis in 2008
Summary
One of the most important tasks is to make sure the portfolio value does not fall drastically under extreme market conditions. Under extreme market conditions, such as occurred 1987 and 2008, there has been no optimal solution for a multi-asset portfolio downside protection. It is important to recognize that such strategies, used for obtaining downside protection under extreme market conditions, should have minimal detrimental effects on the portfolios during intervening years when markets perform normally.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.