Abstract

A systematic literature review provides the basis for identifying consistency in research processes, quality of research methodology, current knowledge, and gaps in knowledge. This information is important as it provides researchers with guidance on a particular area of knowledge, including what worked well, what did not work well, and the direction that future research may take. A systematic review is different to other forms of literature reviews, and this difference is reflected in the method. The following case study looks at the process undertaken when systematically reviewing the literature on “the use of social media as a health intervention in adolescent health.” In particular, the case study highlights the importance of clearly identifying the topic under review, the use of a tested or proven tool to assess the literature, and the dissemination of the findings, that is, writing up the review so that others may understand and if required replicate the study. The case study provides an opportunity to reflect on the processes of a systematic literature review with examples to demonstrate that process.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.