Abstract
In a follow-up study on a "Research Jury Method" for qualitatively adjudicating statements about psychotherapy process and outcome (Bohart, Tallman, Byock, & Mackrill, 2011), the utility of 56 criteria for aiding jurors in analyzing a case history was examined. It was found that these criteria were useful in helping jurors identify aspects of the case that led to their conclusions. Utilizing the criteria also helped jurors adjudicate differences between them.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
