Abstract

In the academic year 2017–18 The Open University Library was asked to examine its collection and content acquisition policies as part of an institution-wide review of services to students and staff. For the part of the project looking at best value of the Library content service, we wanted to review the ‘higher-cost’ content held by the Library, which was in the main the larger journal packages. From the project, we developed a methodology for conducting reviews of our Library resources in much greater depth than we did previously. As part of this process, we also carried out an in-depth overlap analysis for resources that contain full text content. The reason for the development of this methodology was to identify just how much ‘redundancy’ there was in the Library collections, as well as identifying unique selling points of certain collections. Also, by examining the subject coverage of the content we reviewed, we were able to show how well our content aligned with the teaching of the University outlined in the 2018 curriculum plan. The approach we took to this project offers a fresh perspective on how such review tasks can be undertaken in libraries. The methodologies developed could provide a useful tool to others wishing to carry out a similar review.

Highlights

  • In 2018 The Open University Library undertook a project to review some of its higher-cost resources, partly to show justification for the Library’s existing budget and to look at how the content aligned with the University’s 2018 curriculum plan

  • A project team consisting of the Senior Library Manager (Content & Licensing), an E-content Advisor (Academic Librarian) and a Senior Library Assistant was given eight months to carry out this work, along with other tasks including a staffing requirements analysis and literature reviews of Library budget management and research use of Library content

  • The team agreed to start the project by developing a methodology for our resource reviews and using this to evaluate the resources identified as higher-cost content

Read more

Summary

Developing a reusable methodology to conduct a review of library resources

In the academic year 2017–18 The Open University Library was asked to examine its collection and content acquisition policies as part of an institution-wide review of services to students and staff. We developed a methodology for conducting reviews of our Library resources in much greater depth than we did previously. As part of this process, we carried out an in-depth overlap analysis for resources that contain full text content. By examining the subject coverage of the content we reviewed, we were able to show how well our content aligned with the teaching of the University outlined in the 2018 curriculum plan. The methodologies developed could provide a useful tool to others wishing to carry out a similar review

Introduction
ALISON BROCK
The methodology questions
Gathering the data and completing the reviews
Subject coverage
Cost analysis
Use in teaching
Usage trends and content overlap benefited greatly from
Impact of loss of access
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call