Developing a measurement instrument for coping with occupational stress in academia

Melissa Du Plessis,Nico Martins

doi:10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1653

Melissa Du Plessis, Nico Martins

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1653

Copy DOI

Abstract

Orientation: Occupational stress leads to devastating consequences for academia, which include teaching below standard, conflict with students and seeking employment elsewhere. The stressors that academics experience will continue to increase unless they adopt strategies to cope with these demands.Research purpose: The objective of this research was to construct a valid and reliable measurement instrument which could be used to explore how academics cope with occupational stress.Motivation for the study: There is no clear consensus about the conceptualisation of the coping construct and the categorisation and measurement of numerous coping strategies. Also, as working in academia is highly stressful, there is a need for developing a measuring instrument that holistically measures coping with occupational stress in South African higher education institutions.Research approach/design and method: A three-phase instrument development process was followed. A quantitative, cross-sectional online survey was administered to a convenience sample of 305 employees employed in a higher education institution in the Gauteng province of South Africa.Main findings: A nine-dimensional, 33-item measuring instrument was developed for exploring how academics cope with occupational stressors.Practical/managerial implications: If industrial and organisational psychologists could appreciate the consequences of occupational stress and comprehend the complexities of the coping process, then they would be able to design and implement wellness practices that should not only promote the health and well-being of academics but also the institution.Contribution/value-add: A psychometrically sound measuring instrument, The Comprehensive Coping Strategies Questionnaire, was developed within the South African higher education context that would allow industrial and organisational psychologists to determine which coping strategies academics adopt in response to occupational stressors.

Highlights

Background of and rationale for the studyDespite incredible advancements in science and technology, employees across the world still seem to experience high degrees of psychological stress in the workplace (Kinnunen-Amoroso & Liira, 2016)
There is a need to develop a measuring instrument that could holistically measure coping with occupational stress in South African higher education institutions
This study aimed at developing a measuring instrument that could: (1) acknowledge the entire coping process, from when an occupational stressor is perceived until a coping response is adopted (2) consolidate the major types of coping strategies into one measuring instrument and (3) holistically measure coping with occupational stress in South African higher education institutions

Summary

Introduction

Background of and rationale for the studyDespite incredible advancements in science and technology, employees across the world still seem to experience high degrees of psychological stress in the workplace (Kinnunen-Amoroso & Liira, 2016). Darabi et al (2017) warn that the stressors that academics experience will continue to increase unless they adopt strategies and mechanisms to cope with these demands. There is a need to develop a measuring instrument that could holistically measure coping with occupational stress in South African higher education institutions. This study aimed at developing a measuring instrument that could: (1) acknowledge the entire coping process, from when an occupational stressor is perceived until a coping response is adopted (2) consolidate the major types of coping strategies into one measuring instrument and (3) holistically measure coping with occupational stress in South African higher education institutions

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion