Abstract

Judgement bias tasks (JBTs) are used to assess the influence of farm practices on livestock affective states. The tasks must be adjusted to the species and age group of focus. In cattle, most JBTs were designed for calves instead of adult cows. This study aimed to develop a JBT suitable for adult dairy cows, combining feasibility, validity, sensitivity and repeatability. Three JBTs were developed in which cows were trained to reach or avoid reaching a feeder, the location of which signalled a reward or punisher. The tasks differed in terms of punisher—cows being allocated either to “no-reward”, an air puff or an electric shock. Cows were then exposed twice to three ambiguous positions of the feeder, on two separate occasions. Speed of learning and proportions of correct responses to the conditioned locations were used to assess the feasibility of the task. Adjusted latencies to reach the ambiguous feeder positions were used to examine whether response patterns matched the linear and monotonic graded pattern expected in a valid and sensitive JBT at baseline. Latencies to reach the feeders in the two repeated testing sessions were compared to assess ambiguity loss over tasks’ repetitions. The validity of using spatial JBTs for dairy cows was demonstrated. While the effect on JBT feasibility was nuanced, the punisher did influence JBT sensitivity. None of the JBTs’ repeatability could be supported. We conclude that using an air puf as punisher led to the most sensitive, yet non-repeatable, JBT for dairy cows.

Highlights

  • During their life, dairy cows typically experience a number of potentially challenging events, such as overcrowding (Fustini et al 2017) or regrouping (Phillips and Rind 2001), which are likely to influence their welfare

  • Odds ratios (OR) and associated 95 % confidence intervals (CI) are specified for binary data; means of the raw data ± standard error and inter-quartile ranges (IQR) are given otherwise

  • There was no statistical evidence for significant differences in learning speed between punishers (NOTH: 7.2 ± 0.63, IQR=3.3; air puff (AIR): 6.6 ± 0.64, IQR=3.5; electric shock (ELEC): 5.9 ± 0.68, IQR=4.3, p=0.249, χ2=2.78, df=2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dairy cows typically experience a number of potentially challenging events, such as overcrowding (Fustini et al 2017) or regrouping (Phillips and Rind 2001), which are likely to influence their welfare. An accurate assessment of cow welfare must, take into account affective states (Watanabe 2007). Animal Cognition (Baciadonna and McElligott 2015). To this day, the application of JBT in dairy cows remains anecdotal (one study only: Crump et al 2021), and our understanding of dairy cows’ emotional life is limited. By proposing and designing a JBT for dairy cows, dairy scientists may become more inclined to implement this unique tool in their research—an important step to further develop our knowledge of dairy cows’ affective states, and eventually meet the dairy industry’s ambition for improved animal welfare (Weary and Von Keyserlingk 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call