Abstract

BACKGROUNDThe profitability of farming varies based on factors such as a crop's market value, input costs and occurrence of resistant pests, all capable of altering the value of pest management tactics in an integrated pest management program. We provide a framework for calculating expected yield and expected net revenue of pest management scenarios, using the soybean aphid (Aphis glycines) as a case study. Foliar insecticide and host‐plant resistance are effective management tactics for preventing yield loss from soybean aphid outbreaks; however, pyrethroid‐resistant aphid populations pose a management challenge for farmers. We evaluated eight scenarios relevant to soybean aphid management in Iowa with varying probabilities of aphid outbreaks and insecticide‐resistant aphids occurring.RESULTSOur equation suggests that insecticide use is profitable when the probability of an aphid outbreak is ≥29%, and soybean production will become more costly with increasing probability of pyrethroid‐resistant aphids. If farmers continue to use pyrethroids, they will not experience financial consequences from pyrethroid‐resistant aphids until the chance of insecticide resistance is 48%. Aphid‐resistant varieties provided consistent yield and offered the highest net revenue under all conditions.CONCLUSIONThis framework can be used for other crop–pest systems to evaluate the profitability of management tactics and investigate how resistance impacts revenue for farmers. Including the cost of resistance in crop budgets can help farmers and agronomic consultants comprehend these impacts and enhance decision‐making to increase revenue and curb resistance development.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.