Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted almost every sector. This impact has been especially felt in the healthcare sector, as the pandemic has affected its stability, which has highlighted the need for improvements in service. As such, we propose a collaborative decision-making framework that is capable of accounting for the goals of multiple stakeholders, which consequently enables an optimal, consensus decision to be identified. The proposed framework utilizes the best–worst method (BWM) and the Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) methodology to capture and rank each stakeholder’s preferences, followed by the application of a Multi-Objective Linear Programming (MOLP) model to identify the consensus solution. To demonstrate the applicability of the framework, two hypothetical scenarios involving improving patient care in an intensive care unit (ICU) are considered. Scenario 1 reflects all selected criteria under each stakeholder, whereas in Scenario 2, every stakeholder identifies their preferred set of criteria based on their experience and work background. The results for both scenarios indicate that hiring part-time physicians and medical staff can be the effective solution for improving service quality in the ICU. The developed integrated framework will help the decision makers to identify optimal courses of action in real-time and to select sustainable and effective strategies for improving service quality in the healthcare sector.

Highlights

  • Healthcare is a complex service sector that requires the involvement of multiple stakeholders with different preferences and values in the decision-making process [1]

  • We develop an multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) framework and use it to improve the quality of service in an intensive care unit (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic

  • The developed integrated framework was implemented in two hypothetical scenarios designed to demonstrate its feasibility for yielding consensus solutions for improving ICU service quality during the COVID-19 pandemic

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Healthcare is a complex service sector that requires the involvement of multiple stakeholders with different preferences and values in the decision-making process [1]. Glaize et al [2] suggested the use of MCDM tools for different areas in healthcare service improvement. The inclusion of multiple stakeholders in the decisionmaking process is critical for yielding more sustainable solutions, it can make it much more difficult to achieve consensus, as each stakeholder may have their own preferences and values. In the healthcare sector, physicians aim to improve their equipment resources, but the administrative staff may be focused on improving the quality of service received by patients; this divergence in viewpoints makes it difficult to reach a consensus solution. The application of a hybrid decision-making framework can help stakeholders overcome these conflicting aims and find a consensus solution

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call