Abstract

AimsDashboards provide a visual summary of relevant data to track performance against key indicators over time. They are used in healthcare to monitor the quality of patient care and to identify potential quality improvement projects. There is little published evidence of them being used in mental health services, especially in forensic psychiatric care.This project aims to design a dashboard for use in a forensic and intensive psychiatric care unit, by specifying measures and ideal features it would include.To develop a model for a quality dashboard for useTo decide which measures would be reported on the dashboardTo find reliable methods of assessing said measuresTo explore staff preferences as to how the dashboard would display data, and how they would like the information to be disseminatedTo use blank data to design a mock dashboard interface for feedbackMethodA literature search was conducted on healthcare dashboards and quality improvement projects taking place on low-secure psychiatric wards similar to the Blair unit. Potential outcome measures and methods of assessing them were researched. Staff thoughts on the dashboard, and which measures they would like to see included, were explored in interviews and using a surveyResultBlank data were fed into excel to create example graphs for a mock dashboard. The results section details: measures to be included, such as staff turnover rate, absences, and patient satisfaction levels; how they can be assessed; and specific features of the dashboard, such as the capability to track trends in selected quality indicators over a period of time. Further development of this project out with the 4 week development timeframe will require cooperation from IT services and unit management staff.ConclusionMany staff suggestions, whilst valuable measures, were more suitable for use in a clinical or nursing dashboard, rather than a quality dashboard. COVID-19 factored into reasons why staff requested certain measures, and also meant that less staff were available to be contacted about the project. This project has limitations based on the four-week timeframe, but could be further developed by staff on the unit if desired.

Highlights

  • Along with the trainees, doctors working in non-training posts such as staff grade, specialty doctors, trust grade doctors (TJD) and MTI (Medical training initiative) doctors form an integral part of patient care in the NHS

  • An anonymous online questionnaire was sent to junior doctors currently in training and non-training posts at LSCFT in 2019 using Meridian software

  • The data suggested that there was no difference in the frequency of supervisions between training and non-training posts at LSCFT

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Along with the trainees, doctors working in non-training posts such as staff grade, specialty doctors, trust grade doctors (TJD) and MTI (Medical training initiative) doctors form an integral part of patient care in the NHS. An anonymous online questionnaire was sent to junior doctors currently in training and non-training posts at LSCFT in 2019 using Meridian software. 1- Quantitative Data: - Participants included were doctors in training post such as Foundation Doctors (5), Psychiatry Core Trainees (6), GP STs (2) and doctors in non-training post such as TJD (4), Specialty Doctors (2) and MTI doctors (4).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call