Abstract
The author explores Coffey's Lonerganian method and conclusions, and suggests that, while it is important to have a contemporary doctrine of the immanent Trinity, Coffey's own starting point causes him to compromise some of the most important insights of the doctrine that he originally intended to uphold. Coffey's own natural theology, it is claimed, leads him to compromise both God's freedom in se and his free action ad extra by following Rahner's belief that love of neighbour is identical with love of God.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
