Abstract
Earth's long-term history is preserved in the rock archive, yet this record is incomplete, hindering our understanding of how tectonic processes have evolved and shaped our planet's evolution. The physio-chemical resilience of zircon and its ability to be rapidly analyzed for age, isotopic, and elemental data has made it a key phase in unraveling Earth's long-term evolution. The europium anomaly (Eu/Eu*) and the differentiation degree between light and heavy rare earth elements (LREEN¯/HREEN¯) of zircons positively correlate with the pressure of magma crystallization because high pressure inhibits plagioclase crystallization and promotes garnet growth. However, this correlation can be influenced by fluctuations in redox conditions, protolith composition, and water content of magma, whose stability varies in different tectonic settings. Therefore, the correlation coefficient between Eu/Eu* and LREEN¯/HREEN¯ of detrital zircons (rDz) provides a new proxy to help distinguish tectonic settings. We evaluate this new proxy using available global detrital zircon REE data from different tectonic settings in modern and deep times. The data from well-constrained simple tectonic settings suggest that rDz is higher in convergent settings (0.53–0.85) than in collisional settings (0.12–0.51). Convergent settings can also yield relatively low rDz (0.28–0.55) when there is a contribution of a mantle plume lying below the overriding plate of a subduction zone.When studying a detrital zircon archive derived from a large distributive province that includes sources from a variety of settings, known provenance information should be used to disentangle mixed source signals. Also, only considering detrital zircon grains that formed a short time (e.g., 50 or 100 Myr) prior to deposition can reduce the likelihood of multi-cycle distal mixing of contemporaneous but tectonically distinct zircons in a sample. Additionally, greater confidence in interpretations of changes in tectonic settings may be derived from evolution patterns of rDz instead of isolated values. A decreasing trend can likely be interpreted as a transition from convergent to collisional or mantle plume settings, whereas an increasing trend implies an opposite tectonic transition.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.