Detrimental immediate and long-term clinical effects of right ventricular pacing in patients with myocardial fibrosis

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Long-term right ventricular (RV) pacing leads to heart failure or a decline in left ventricular (LV) function in up to a fifth of patients. Objectives We aimed to establish whether patients with focal fibrosis detected on late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) have deterioration in LV function after RV pacing. Methods We recruited 110 patients (84 in final analysis) into two observational CMR studies. Patients (n = 34) with a dual chamber device and preserved atrioventricular (AV) conduction underwent CMR in two asynchronous pacing modes (AOO & DOO) to compare intrinsic conduction with RV pacing. Patients (n = 50) with high-grade AV block underwent CMR before and 6 months after pacemaker implantation to investigate the long-term effects of RV pacing. Results: The three key findings were 1) Initiation of RV pacing in patients with fibrosis, compared to those without, was associated with greater immediate changes in both LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) (5.3 ± 3.5 vs 2.1 ± 2.4 mL/m2; p < 0.01) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (-5.7 ± 3.4% vs -3.2 ± 2.6%; p = 0.02); 2) Long-term RV pacing in patients with fibrosis, compared to those without, was associated with greater changes in LVESVi (8.0 ± 10.4 vs -0.6 ± 7.3 mL/m2; p = 0.008) and LVEF (-12.3 ± 7.9 vs -6.7 ± 6.2%; p = 0.012); 3) Patients with fibrosis did not experience an improvement in quality of life, biomarkers or functional class after pacemaker implantation. Conclusions Fibrosis detected on CMR is associated with immediate and long-term deterioration in LV function following RV pacing and could be used to identify those at risk of heart failure prior to pacemaker implantation. Characteristics before and after pacing Study 1 No fibrosis (n = 16) Fibrosis (n = 18) AOO DOO p-value AOO DOO p-value LVEDVi - mL/m² 66 ± 13 66 ± 12 0.67 78 ± 14 79 ± 13 0.34 LVESVi - mL/m² 30 ± 10 32 ± 9 0.003 38 ± 11 43 ± 12 <0.001 LVEF - % 56 ± 6 53 ± 5 <0.001 52 ± 8 47 ± 9 <0.001 Mechanical Dyssynchrony index - ms 61 ± 17 71 ± 25 0.07 81 ± 18 89 ± 21 0.04 Study 2 No fibrosis (n = 19) Fibrosis (n = 31) Pre-PPM Post-PPM p-value Pre-PPM Post-PPM p-value LVEDVi -mL/m² 88 ± 21 73 ± 14 <0.001 90 ± 18 83 ± 21 0.007 LVESVi -mL/m² 35 ± 9 34 ± 9 0.71 41 ± 14 49 ± 21 0.001 LVEF - % 60 ± 5 54 ± 7 <0.001 56 ± 8 43 ± 12 <0.001 Mechanical Dyssynchrony index - ms 70 ± 29 81 ± 22 0.15 84 ± 30 98 ± 31 0.03 Abstract Figure. Mechanism for heart failure after pacing