Abstract

Accurately reproducing multi-directional irregular waves in laboratory or numerical wave basin is crucial for in-depth study of real wave-action on marine structures. In this paper, the EEED (Equal-Energy-in-Each-Division) and PTPD (Phase-Time-Path-Difference) approaches are described, and their capability for reconstructing multi-directional irregular waves is assessed. The key difference between these two methods is the determination of the component wave directions. Theoretically and (arbitrary) numerically simulated multi-directional waves with different directional distribution width and wave steepness are reconstructed, and the latter waves are further reproduced in a numerical wave basin. The consistency between the reconstructed and the theoretical/measured waves demonstrates the approaches are acceptable. Furthermore, the variation of the quantitative error between the reconstructed and the theoretical/measured waves in the spatial domain (rr/Ls) is analyzed. This variation increases with the size of rr/Ls, but the errors are acceptable as long as this size is reasonable. The application ranges are evaluated based on a qualitative comparative analysis between the reconstructed waves and the theoretical/measured ones and the quantitative reconstruction error along rr/Ls. The PTPD approach is generally better than EEED method. The optimum relative separation for wave gauges using the PTPD approach should be smaller than 0.12Ls.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.