Abstract
ObjectiveThere is an increased mortality rate of patients residing in rural compared with urban communities. Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) decrease both the time to hospital arrival and trauma mortality in patients originating from rural areas. An unreported number of urban residents are served by HEMS. Our objective was to quantify the fraction of urban residents who live in the adjoining city of a HEMS base and are transferred by helicopter while they are in rural areas. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of HEMS charts between 1985 and 2022. Records were assessed for patients’ city and postal code. A secondary database was searched to assess mission location. ResultsThirty-five thousand nine hundred seventy-one cases were analyzed; 3,871 (10.76%) cases involved patients residing within the urban area of an open HEMS base, and 32,100 (89.24%) did not. This contrasts with 2.04% of all missions conducted in urban areas. Cases flown with patients from outside of the 3 provinces were as follows: British Columbia (1,233/21,941; 5.3% of Alberta cases), international (988/35,971; 2.7% of total cases), Ontario (177/4,691; 3.6% of Manitoba cases), and other provinces combined (158/3,5971; 0.4% of total cases). ConclusionWe highlight the impact of HEMS, where it serves both rural residents and all people who work in, travel through, visit, or recreate across the areas that our HEMS supports.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.