Determining the vertebra for pedicle subtraction osteotomy in surgical correction for ankylosing spondylitis with thoracolumbar kyphosis

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to provide a method for determining the apical vertebra for pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in corrective surgery for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK). METHODS The medical records of AS patients with TLK who underwent PSO between May 2009 and August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed, and 235 patients were included in the study. Using the proposed method, choosing the vertebra based on Kim’s apex (KA), which is defined as the farthest vertebra from a line drawn from the center of the T10 vertebral body to the midpoint of the S1 upper endplate, the authors analyzed 229 patients with apices at T12, L1, or L2 (excluding L3 because of the small sample size, n = 6). They divided all patients into two groups. Group A (n = 144) underwent PSO at the KA vertebra, while group B (n = 85) underwent PSO at a different level. Demographic and radiological data, including sagittal spinopelvic parameters of the entire spine, were collected. An additional analysis was performed on patients with the same KA vertebra. RESULTS The vertebra distributions of patients based on KA were T12 (28 [12.2%]), L1 (119 [52.0%]), and L2 (82 [35.8%]). The corrections of sagittal vertical axis (SVA; 101.0 ± 48.5 mm vs 82.0 ± 53.8 mm, p = 0.010), global kyphosis (GK; 31.6° ± 10.0° vs 26.4° ± 10.5°, p = 0.005), and TLK (29.4° ± 10.2° vs 24.2° ± 12.9°, p = 0.012) in group A were significantly greater than those in group B, and there was no difference in the corrections of thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis, and pelvic incidence between the two groups. On further analysis, group A showed greater correction in TK (26.2° ± 13.7° vs 0.1° ± 8.1°, p = 0.013) for patients with T12 as the KA; greater improvements in SVA (101.5 ± 44.2 mm vs 73.4 ± 48.7 mm, p = 0.020), GK (30.6° ± 11.0° vs 25.0° ± 10.4°, p = 0.046), and TLK (32.6° ± 7.8° vs 26.7° ± 9.9°, p = 0.012) for those with L1 as the KA; and significant correction in TLK (30.0° ± 6.3° vs 4.3° ± 19.5°, p = 0.008) for patients with L2 as the KA, compared with group B. CONCLUSIONS PSO at the apical vertebra provides a greater degree of correction of sagittal imbalance. The proposed method, selecting the vertebra based on KA, is easily reproducible for determining the apex level in AS patients with TLK.