Abstract

Panel surveys need to balance the benefits of repeated measurements (e.g., bounded interview, reduced cost, increased response rates) with the drawbacks that may eventually occur (e.g., respondent fatigue, mode effect). The optimal number of interview waves for a panel survey needs to maximize the advantages while minimizing the potential for bias due to incorporating sampling units for too many interview waves. In this paper, we develop cost models for two potential constraints: (1) keeping the number of interviews constant across designs, and (2) keeping the cost constant across designs. These models are applied to the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). The NCVS currently uses a seven-wave or time-in-sample (TIS) design. In an effort to maintain or reduce costs and improve data quality, the Bureau of Justice Statistics commissioned a Panel Design Study to evaluate the effects of changing the NCVS from a 7-TIS design to a 5-TIS, 4-TIS, 3-TIS, or 1-TIS design. The study used a set of simulations to mimic different panel designs. The simulation assumptions were constructed using NCVS data from 1999 to 2011, and included assumptions about sample sizes, costs, response rates, household replacement, type of interview, demographics, and victimization propensities. Samples were simulated with different panel designs and summary victimization propensities, and standard errors were computed for key estimates. Simulations considered both keeping the cost constant and keeping the number of interviews constant across the different panel design options. In this paper, we show the impact of changing the number of panel TISs on property and violent victimization rates in terms of point estimates, variability, sample sizes, and costs, by several population characteristics. Simulation results found that a 4-TIS design is optimal for the NCVS.

Highlights

  • Interviews are conducted in approximately 90,000 households, and 160,000 individuals are interviewed in the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) each year [1, 2]

  • In the case of the NCVS, samples of 50,000 households are released to the field every 6 months allocated across seven rotation groups

  • For a 1-TIS design, the increase in cost is 37.7%, but for all other designs, the change in cost is less than 10%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sponsored by the Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) and conducted by the U.S Census Bureau, the NCVS is a nationally representative, probability-based household survey that interviews all people 12 years and older in a selected household. Interviews are conducted in approximately 90,000 households, and 160,000 individuals are interviewed in the NCVS each year [1, 2]. In the case of the NCVS, samples of 50,000 households are released to the field every 6 months allocated across seven rotation groups. The households remain in the sample for 3 and a half years and are interviewed seven times (at 6-month intervals) during that period [1]. The time-in-sample (TIS) for a household in the NCVS is seven

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.