Abstract
Landslide disaster risk reduction necessitates the investigation of different geotechnical causal factors for slope failures. Machine learning (ML) techniques have been proposed to study causal factors across many application areas. However, the development of ensemble ML techniques for identifying the geotechnical causal factors for slope failures and their subsequent prediction has lacked in literature. The primary goal of this research is to develop and evaluate novel feature selection methods for identifying causal factors for slope failures and assess the potential of ensemble and individual ML techniques for slope failure prediction. Twenty-one geotechnical causal factors were obtained from 60 sites (both landslide and non-landslide) spread across a landslide-prone area in Mandi, India. Relevant causal factors were evaluated by developing a novel ensemble feature selection method that involved an average of different individual feature selection methods like correlation, information-gain, gain-ratio, OneR, and F-ratio. Furthermore, different ensemble ML techniques (Random Forest (RF), AdaBoost (AB), Bagging, Stacking, and Voting) and individual ML techniques (Bayesian network (BN), decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and support vector machine (SVM)) were calibrated to 70% of the locations and tested on 30% of the sites. The ensemble feature selection method yielded six major contributing parameters to slope failures: relative compaction, porosity, saturated permeability, slope angle, angle of the internal friction, and in-situ moisture content. Furthermore, the ensemble RF and AB techniques performed the best compared to other ensemble and individual ML techniques on test data. The present study discusses the implications of different causal factors for slope failure prediction.
Highlights
IntroductionSome attempts to monitor these slope failures have relied on a number of conventional and lowcost methods (Fell et al, 2005; Joyce et al, 2008; Guzzetti et al, 2012; Thiebes et al, 2012; Calvello et al, 2015; Dikshit et al, 2017; Kumar et al, 2019; Park et al, 2019; Ma et al, 2020)
Slope failures, the soil or debris movements along sloping surfaces, have significantly impacted the infrastructure and life in hilly areas (National Institute of Disaster Management, 2016; Parkash 2011)
The ensemble and individual Machine learning (ML) techniques with all 21 geotechnical factors were evaluated for their ability to predict slope failures across different sites
Summary
Some attempts to monitor these slope failures have relied on a number of conventional and lowcost methods (Fell et al, 2005; Joyce et al, 2008; Guzzetti et al, 2012; Thiebes et al, 2012; Calvello et al, 2015; Dikshit et al, 2017; Kumar et al, 2019; Park et al, 2019; Ma et al, 2020) These methods have helped generate slope movement estimates at deployment sites (Kumar et al, 2021)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.