Determining the Agreement Between Common Measures Related to Vestibulo-ocular Reflex Function After a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Children and Adolescents

Abstract

ObjectiveTo (1) determine the level of agreement between symptom provocation and performance-based tests of vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) function after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and (2) describe the level of symptom provocation induced by a VOR task in individuals with and without cervical findings. DesignCross-sectional. SettingThis study was conducted at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. ParticipantsA total of 101 participants (N=101) aged 6-18 years within 3 weeks of mTBI diagnosis were included (54.5% female; mean age, 13.92±2.63 years; mean time since injury at assessment, 18.26±6.16 days). InterventionsNone. Main Outcome MeasuresSymptom provocation (Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening tool), performance (clinician-observed VOR performance, head thrust test [HTT], computerized dynamic visual acuity test, video head impulse test), and cervical impairment (cervical flexion-rotation test, range of motion test, self-reported neck pain). Agreement was evaluated using Cohen's κ statistic. ResultsNo outcomes demonstrated agreement with symptom provocation (κ=−0.15 to 0.14). Fair agreement demonstrated between clinician-observed VOR performance and HTT (κ=0.32), with little to no agreement demonstrated between other measures. Proportions reporting test-induced dizziness and headache were greater among individuals with cervical findings (29.1%-41.8%) than without (2.3%-6.8%). ConclusionsFindings support that symptom provocation and performance-based tests measure different constructs and thus have distinct roles when assessing VOR function. Findings suggest results from measures of symptom provocation may be influenced by coexisting cervical impairments, underlining the value of assessing for cervical injury after pediatric mTBI.