Abstract

In Hill v. Anderson , 881 F.3d 483 (2018), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals considered whether Ohio correctly reviewed the defendant's writ of habeas corpus that sought relief from capital sentencing. Mr. Danny Hill challenged his capital sentence, claiming he is intellectually disabled as

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call