Determining how diluted bloodstains were derived: Inferring distinctive characteristics and formulating a guideline

Abstract

In forensic settings, diluted bloodstains are regularly encountered for example when bloodstains are mixed with tap-/rainwater, after deliberate cleaning attempts, or when blood is dropped on a wet surface such as a towel. Such diluted bloodstain scenarios can be subdivided into sequences of events in which a blood drop was either (1) readily diluted (a mixture of blood and water is deposited); (2) deposited on a surface that was readily moistened (first water, then blood) or (3) deposited and subsequently moistened (first blood, then water). Current bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) lacks data and tools to distinguish these three ways of derivation of a diluted bloodstain that vary in the sequence of deposition of blood and water on textile. In this study, 880 bloodstains were examined for characteristics that can be used to determine the derivation of diluted bloodstains. A guideline to assist BPA-analysts in interpreting diluted bloodstains was extracted. The added value of this guideline was confirmed by conducting two surveys: one survey with and one without the guideline. A third survey confirmed that the characteristics also function on a broader range of textile types that have different weave and knit styles. This guideline can aid BPA-experts to determine, in an objective way, how diluted bloodstains derived which can aid in determining which activities took place at a crime scene.