Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric method for evaluating the efficiency of Decision Making Units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. In the traditional DEA models, the DMU is allowed to use its most favorable multiplier weights to maximize its efficiency. There is usually more than one efficient DMU which cannot be further discriminated. Evaluating DMUs with different multiplier weights would also be somewhat irrational in practice. The common weights DEA model is an effective method for solving these problems. In this paper, we propose a methodology combining the common weights DEA with Shannon’s entropy. In our methodology, we propose a modified weight restricted DEA model for calculating non-zero optimal weights. Then these non-zero optimal weights would be aggregated to be the common weights using Shannon’s entropy. Compared with the traditional models, our proposed method is more powerful in discriminating DMUs, especially when the inputs and outputs are numerous. Our proposed method also keeps in accordance with the basic DEA method considering the evaluation of the most efficient and inefficient DMUs. Numerical examples are provided to examine the validity and effectiveness of our proposed methodology.

Highlights

  • IntroductionData Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been proved to be an effective methodology for the efficiency evaluation of Decision Making Units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and multiple outputs

  • Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was first introduced by Charnes et al [1] in 1978

  • The common weights DEA model is an important extension of the traditional DEA methodology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

DEA has been proved to be an effective methodology for the efficiency evaluation of Decision Making Units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. In the DEA methodology, the efficiency of a DMU is defined as a ratio of its weighted sum of outputs to its weighted sum of inputs [2]. In the traditional DEA models, a DMU is allowed to use its most favorable multiplier weights to achieve its maximum efficiency score. It would be somewhat irrational that different DMUs are evaluated with different sets of multiplier weights. Different methods have been developed for this problem, such as the super efficiency model, cross-efficiency model and so on [2] These mentioned models are still based on different sets of multiplier weights which could be irrational sometimes

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.