Abstract
In the 1997 case of Ruka v Department of Social Welfare, the Court of Appeal altered the test for determining whether a relationship was "in the nature of marriage" for the purposes of the Social Security Act 1964. In this article, the author analyses the impact of the decision on Department of Work and Incomes practice and on the subsequent decisions of the Social Security Appeal Authority. The author questions whether either Department or Appeal Authority has significantly altered their policy in light of the test adopted by the majority in Ruka. In light of its practical application, the author then critically accesses the test in Ruka and concludes that the general approach favoured by previous decisions of the High Court, and apparently continued by the Department subsequent to Ruka, is preferable.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
