Abstract
Urinary cortisol determination was performed with three commercially available immunoassays: one enzyme-immunoassay (Cortisol Biotrol) (EIA) and two radioimmunoassays: Quanticoat Cortisol (Kallestad Diagnostics) (KD-RIA) and GammaCoat Cortisol (Clinical Assays) (CA-RIA). Four procedures were carried out. Procedure I (methylene chloride extraction) was applied to EIA and CA-RIA and procedure II (ethyl acetate extraction) to KD-RIA. Procedure III combining procedure I and column chromatrography on Sephadex LH 20 in methylene chloride was applied to the three kits. Procedure IV consisting of carbon tetrachloride preextraction and extraction with cyclohexane-ethyl acetate (50:50, v/v) was applied to CA-RIA. The results obtained were compared with those of the reference technique, “on-line” HPLC with u.v. detection. Two groups of results were arbitrarily considered, those below ( n = 28) and those above ( n = 6) 270 nmol/l. In the first group, the results were markedly overestimated when the procedure was limited to solvent extraction. Conversely, the third procedure proved the efficiency of the chromatographic step since specificity was greatly improved in the three cases, the levels obtained with either kits being similar to those of the reference technique. The second group of results (above 270 nmol/l) yielded by the three kits were not always higher than those of HPLC when the procedure was limited to solvent extraction. When column chromatography was included in the procedure, the results were comparable to those of HPLC in three cases and lower in the three others. Since, the latter samples were collected after cortisol administration, and overestimated cortisol values obtained by HPLC might be due to the interference of some cortisol metabolites.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have