Abstract

The use of the ion microprobe for quantitative analysis of Sr, Y, Zr, La, Sm, and Yb in melilite and pyroxene is evaluated. Three trace element-doped synthetic glasses of composition Ak 40, Ak 80, and Di 2AbAn were analyzed by ion microprobe (IMP) using ion yields determined from Corning glass standards. IMP-determined oxide concentrations in the Di 2AbAn glass agree well with electron microprobe (EMP) analyses (to within 6%), but IMP analyses of the melilite glasses deviate from EMP averages by up to 19%. The deviations are due to erroneous SiO 2 estimates caused by suppression of Si ion intensities by the enhanced concentrations of Ca and Al in the melilite glasses compared to the standards. Thus, in order to determine compositions of melilite, diopside, and glass from subliquidus experiments on each of the three starting compositions, we adopted a new set of ion yields such that IMP analyses of the three starting glasses reproduce the EMP average compositions. Further IMP and EMP comparisons of the subliquidus assemblages show that quantitative analyses of melilite, diopside, and glass can be obtained by IMP that are within 10% of the concentrations obtained by EMP, when ion yields determined from glass starting compositions are used. EMP-IMP comparison of crystal and glass analyses also suggests that a structural matrix effect may result in overestimation of SrO (10–12%) in melilite by IMP. Comparison of our data for Ak 12 and Ak 90 melilite compositions with literature results shows that melilite/liquid D- values for REE 3+ determined by IMP decrease with increasing X AK ( Ak 90: D la = 0.038, D Sm = 0.032, D Yb = 0.0086 ; Ak 12: 0.67, 0.75, 0.25 , respectively) while that for Sr (=Eu 2+) changes only slightly (0.99 to 0.78, respectively). Since X Ak increases with decreasing temperature for all melilite with X Ak < 0.7 , a progressively larger positive Eu anomaly is predicted for melilite as it crystallizes with falling temperature. Our diopside/liquid data are characterized by a large degree of scatter on most interelement correlation plots of apparent partition coefficients. The data cannot be understood in terms of simple models of boundary layer formation but require a complex surface partitioning explanation. Nevertheless, estimates of diopside/liquid D- values are in excellent agreement with literature data.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call