Abstract
The accuracy and precision of the results obtained for total mercury in various environmental and biological samples and certified reference materials (CRMs) by various analytical methods, including k 0-instrumental neutron activation analysis (k 0-INAA), radiochemical neutron activation analysis (RNAA) and cold vapour atomic absorption (and atomic fluorescence) spectrometry (CVAAS/AFS) used in routine analysis in our laboratory, were investigated. Three natural matrix reference materials (RMs) from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), five CRMs from the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM), six CRMs from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and one from the Jožef Stefan Institute (IJS) were analyzed. The results obtained show good agreement between certified or assigned values, and between the methods used, except for some data obtained by k 0-INAA in biological samples. This can be explained by losses during irradiation in semi-open systems (irradiation in plastic ampoules) and/or spectral interferences.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
