Abstract

Presbyopia treatments using various modalities have been developed recently; however, no standard criteria exist for the diagnosis and treatment endpoint. This study assessed the relationship between the near visual acuity (NVA) and the subjective symptoms of phakic presbyopia and determined the numerical NVA threshold to diagnose phakic presbyopia and evaluate the effectiveness of presbyopia treatment. The binocular distance, NVA with habitual correction, and monocular conventional VA were measured. Patients were asked about their awareness of presbyopia and difficulty performing near tasks. This prospective observational study included 70 patients (mean age, 56 years; range, 32–77). Most patients became aware of presbyopia in their late forties, although some had difficulty with vision-related near tasks before becoming aware of presbyopia. Eighty three percent of patients (20/24) experienced difficulty with near vision-related tasks even with excellent NVA at 40 cm with habitual correction of 0.0 logMAR (20/20 in Snellen VA). In conclusion, the current study showed that patients became aware of presbyopia in their late forties, although some had difficulty with near vision-related tasks before becoming aware of presbyopia. Further investigation should include the proposal of appropriate diagnostic criteria for presbyopia and better management for patients with presbyopia.

Highlights

  • Presbyopia is a global problem that affects about one quarter of the world’s population [1]

  • The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the near visual acuity (NVA) and the subjective symptoms of phakic presbyopia and to determine the numerical NVA threshold to diagnose phakic presbyopia and evaluate the effectiveness of presbyopia correction according to subjective patient symptoms

  • The questionnaire showed that 65.7% (46/70) of patients replied that they had presbyopic symptoms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Presbyopia is a global problem that affects about one quarter of the world’s population [1]. The number of people with impaired near vision due to presbyopia is estimated to decrease by about 20% by 2050 because of the increasing myopia prevalence [1]. Presbyopia remains an important health problem that may affect the quality of life of individuals in developing countries without awareness of presbyopia or accessibility to affordable treatment [1,2] and in developed countries where people tend to be engaged in near tasks because of the increasing use of digital technology. Previous studies of presbyopia treatment using various treatment modalities [3] used arbitrary numerical criteria to determine treatment efficacy because of the absence of standardized criteria. The patient-reported outcome measures have been used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies for presbyopia treatment [3,4]. Considering recent developments of presbyopia treatments using various modalities [3,5–9], simple and accessible standardized criteria for diagnosis and endpoints of treatment are necessary

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call