Abstract
The results of light yield (LY) measurements of 2×2×8 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> and 2×2×10 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> LuYAP and LYSO pixels are compared with Monte-Carlo simulations of equivalent systems performed with the light ray tracing program LITRANI. It is shown that the differences in LY observed for different setup configurations are well explained by the different light collection efficiencies η <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">L</inf> of the setups derived from the simulations. Combining the results on LY and η <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">L</inf> for a reference system makes it possible to determine the absolute light yield LY <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">abs</inf> for LuYAP and LYSO.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
