Abstract

Abstract Tests with the du Pont machine show that the practice of expressing abrasion test results as an abrasive index, i.e., abrasion-resistance relative to a standard rubber, does not enable different types of abrasive to be used indiscriminately because these are found to give widely different abrasive indices for the same rubber; thus, some abrasives may give four times as high an index as others. If attention is confined to abrasive papers, as distinct from bonded abrasive wheels, this variation is reduced, but is still large enough to be a serious factor in accurate work. It is clear that, even when this comparative method of testing is used, standardization of the abrasive paper is essential to reduce discrepancies between results obtained in different laboratories. Discrepancies will still exist, however, because abrasive paper is not uniform, and there is evidence that abrasive indices determined on different portions of the same paper may differ as much as those from different types of paper. To minimize the effect of this nonuniformity, two courses are open. (1) All the rubbers to be compared could be abraded on one and the same area of paper, preferably a large area to avoid wearing the surface, e.g., by giving each rubber a short run on each of the several paper discs used, instead of using a different disc for each rubber. (2) Different specimens could be tested on the two sides of the machine provided this has a pivotted arm. It is shown that this technique has several advantages. The factors that cause the abrasive index to vary from one abrasive to another are not known; it appears, however, that the degree of abrasiveness is not a determining factor. The two methods of calculating abrasion loss—as cc. per hr. and cc. per H.P.-hr.,—usually do not give the same abrasive index; in any standard test method it is therefore essential to state which is to be used. The variation of the abrasive index from one abrasive to another is the same whichever method of calculation is used.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.