Abstract

This paper compares methods for phosphorus determination in refractory silicoaluminous materials based on inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry. Chemical interferences were studied by using several calibration standards and standard additions. The limits of detection obtained by XRF spectrometry (0.03 and 0.06 mg P 2O 5 per gram of sample) are clearly advantageous as compared with those obtained by ICP-AES (0.2 mg g −1). Phosphorus can successfully be determined by XRF spectrometry with either pressed sample pellets or diluted sample beads. Matrix effects were minimised by using a certified bauxite as a standard, but several less-similar materials could be used, such as siderurgic slag, chamotte and even dolomite for low P 2O 5 content samples. The linear calibration range is larger (up to 100 mg g −1) when analysis is carried out by ICP-AES, using the 213.628 nm line. Repeatability is similar with both methods, but XRF spectrometry is preferred on the grounds of the better sensitivity achieved, and the simpler sample preparation requirements.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.