Abstract
AbstractInvestigations on the molecular weight distribution of cyrstalline polypropylene were carried out by column fractionation and gel‐permeation chromatography for the purpose of comparing the determination methods. Average molecular weight, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis were calculated as statistical parameters from the distribution curve of each, and the number‐average and weight‐average molecular weights were determined by osmometry and light scattering. The molecular weight distribution curves obtained from column fractionation were found to be narrower than those from gel‐permeation chromatography, and it was confirmed that the molecular weight distribution curve obtained from GPC was more accurate and reliable than that from column fractionation by the fact that the average molecular weight from GPC agreed fairly well with that from the absolute methods. On the other hand, no clear difference between these determination methods was observed with respect to skewness and kurtosis of the data, while the standard deviation from GPC seemed to be greater than that from column fractionation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Polymer Science Part A-1: Polymer Chemistry
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
