Abstract

The accuracy of the forming limit diagram (FLD) determined through Nakazima test is often influenced by non-linear strain path (NLSP) and through-thickness stress. The influence of these factors on measurement accuracy can be weakened or avoided in Marciniak test. But meanwhile, Marciniak test is difficult in operation and possesses poor repeatability. Therefore, the Nakazima test eliminating the influencing factors of accuracy is still an attractive method due to the easy operability and good repeatability. In the present research, two FLDs of aluminium alloy 6014-T4 that were established through Nakazima and Marciniak tests were compared. In order to obtain an accurate FLD in plane-stress state and linear strain paths via Nakazima test, a modified compensation method was applied in Nakazima test to eliminate the interferences of NLSP and through-thickness stress on measuring forming limits. The ultimate strains measured in Nakazima test were transformed to stress-based forming limits through constitutive models to remove the influence of through-thickness stress. Then, the corrected ultimate stresses were transformed back to the limit strains along linear strain paths. Compensated results of Nakazima test showed a good agreement with the experimental results from Marciniak test, proving the validity of this method. Thus, through the easy-operate Nakazima test, an FLD with comparable accuracy to that based on Marciniak test was established.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.