Abstract

BackgroundThere is a need for better interpretation of orthopedic treatment effects. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are already commonly used for patient evaluation. PROMs can be used to determine treatment effects in research as well as in clinical settings by calculating change scores, with pre- and post-treatment evaluation. The smallest detectable change (SDC) and minimal important change (MIC) are two important benchmarks for interpreting these change scores. The purpose was to determine the SDC and the MIC for four commonly used shoulder-related PROMs: Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH and QuickDASH), and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS).MethodsA cohort of 164 consecutive patients with shoulder problems visiting an orthopedic outpatient clinic completed the SST, DASH, and the OSS at their first visit and 6 months after operative or non-operative treatment. The SDC was calculated with a test re-test protocol (0–2 weeks). For the MIC, change scores (0–6 months of evaluation) were calculated in seven subgroups of patients, according to an additional self-administered ranking of change over time (anchor-based mean change technique). The MIC is defined as the average score of the ‘slightly improved’ group according to the anchor. The QuickDASH was computed from the DASH.ResultsThe SDC of the SST was 2.8, DASH 16.3, QuickDASH 17.1, and OSS 6.0. The MIC change score for the SST was 2.2, DASH 12.4, QuickDASH 13.4, and OSS 6.0.ConclusionThis study shows that on an individual patient-based level, when taking into account SDC and MIC, the change score should exceed 2.8 points for the SST, 16.3 points for the DASH, 17.1 points for the QuickDASH, and 6.0 points for the OSS to have a clinically relevant change on a PROM, which is not due to measurement error.

Highlights

  • Shoulder pain is the third most common musculoskeletal complaint, after back and knee pains [1]

  • Interpretability refers to what a Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) score means; for example, a given score can be interpreted by providing reference data from the general population

  • We asked 164 consecutive patients with shoulder complaints to participate in this study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Shoulder pain is the third most common musculoskeletal complaint, after back and knee pains [1]. In research and clinical practice, Over the past decade, there has been a shift in interest from pathophysiological measurements to measuring patient-perceived health. This has resulted in increased use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs, known as PROs). The consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) initiative provide a checklist of standards for assessing the measurement properties of validity, reliability, and responsiveness [3,4]. This list does not include interpretability, which is a very important attribute of a questionnaire used in daily clinical practice. The purpose was to determine the SDC and the MIC for four commonly used shoulder-related PROMs: Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH and QuickDASH), and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call