Abstract

Background:Self-stigma in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) can substantially impact quality of life and possibilities for social participation. An integrative analysis of determinants of self-stigma has been lacking.Objective:We sought to explore which complementary insights from qualitative and quantitative studies, as well as from expert consultation, could be gained.Methods:An established mixed methods study design was employed to first conduct a mixed methods scoping review of published qualitative and quantitative literature, and then consult with experts to arrive at an exhaustive list of determinants of self-stigma after a thematic synthesis.Results:A total of 87 unique determinants of self-stigma were identified. Quantitative studies and expert consultations mainly identified personal determinants of people with self-stigma (e.g., age, anxiety, or apathy). In contrast, qualitative studies identified social situations associated with self-stigma (e.g., joint meals of people with typical PD with others). Notably, self-stigma of people with PD was found to be particularly salient in unfamiliar places, at the working place or in contact with people without PD. Across methods, cognitive impairment, tremor, and abnormal walk and unsteady gait, respectively, were associated with self-stigma.Conclusion:The mixed method study design yielded complementary insights, but also factors commonly associated with self-stigma across methods. Future prioritization exercises may gain further insights into self-stigma of people with PD. Facilitating social encounters by both addressing needs of affected people and raising knowledge and public awareness may improve quality of life in people with PD.

Highlights

  • Self-stigma in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) can substantially impact quality of life and possibilitiesT for social participation

  • Qualitative studies identified social situations associated with self-stigma

  • O Conclusion: The mixed method study design yielded complementary insights, and factors commonly associated with self-stigma across methods

Read more

Summary

C Methods

An established mixed methods study design was employed to first conduct a mixed methods scoping review of published qualitative and quantitative literature, and consult with experts to arrive at an exhaustive list of determinants.

Results
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Summary of findings
X X XX
E Who: Others Who Don’t Have Typical PD
Strengths and limitations of the study

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.