Abstract

Model 1 explained 37 % of the variance in total body T-score, F (4, 253) = 39.43, p < 0.001. Model 2 explained a further 3 % of the variance, F (11, 246) = 16.28, p < 0.001. Model 3 explained a further 1 % of the variance, F (15, 242) = 13.00, p < 0.001. The main variables which explained most of the variance in total body T score were increasing age, which was associated with lower BMD ( b= - 0.26; p = 0.001), higher percentage body fat, which was associated with higher BMD ( b= 0.225; p = 0.048), higher fat free mass (FFM), which was associated with higher BMD ( b= 0.385; p < 0.001) and current smoking which was negatively associated with BMD ( b= - 0.163; p = 0.001). Within this cohort, BTM did not explain any of the variance in BMD, albeit the obvious risk factors of increasing age and smoking were associated with a lower total body BMD, whereas weight (FM and FFM) were associated with a higher BMD. Similar findings have been reported recently by others (4,5) . In conclusion, findings from this study indicate that there is a relationship between FFM and BMD, suggesting that muscle weight has an additional predictive value over fat mass and, together with exercise, may potentially help to prevent osteoporosis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.